Sarat Chandra Swain (B) v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
This appeal lacks instructions. The writ petition was disposed of for non-appearance/no instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OA) No. 675 of 2002
Sarat Chandra Swain (B) ..... Petitioner
Mr. S.B. Jena, Advocate
- Versus-
State of Odisha & Ors. ….. Opp. Parties
State Counsel
CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
25.08.2021
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
01
2. Mr. S.B. Jena, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he
has no instruction.
3. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of for
having no instructions.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
GDS JUDGE
2
3
Sarat Chandra Swain (B)
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court