Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition alleging a settlement was reached with opposite party no.2. The court dismissed the petition based on the withdrawal application and settlement report.
Withdrawal of the writ petition granted; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.9920 of 2015 (Through hybrid mode)
M/S ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Co. Ltd. and another
Petitioners
Ms. N. Ray, Advocate
-versus-
The Permanent Lok Adalat for Public Utility Service (PUS) & another
…. Opposite parties
Mr. Y.S.P. Babu, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
ORDER
25.11.2021
Order No.
10. 1. Ms. Ray, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, memorandum of withdrawal dated 28th October, 2021 has been filed. The memorandum says settlement has been arrived at between petitioner and opposite party no.2. As such, petitioners want to withdraw the writ petition.
2. In view of position taken by petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed.
(Arindam Sinha) Judge
Prasant
Page 1 of 1
M/S ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Co. Ltd. and another
The Permanent Lok Adalat for Public Utility Service (PUS) & another
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
