The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition. The advocates for the opposite parties assured the court that they would not store chemicals in the premises.
The writ petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.22103 of 2020
(Through hybrid mode)
Trishna Agarwal
…. Petitioner
Mr.K.K.Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr.P.C.Panda, Addl. Govt. Advocate Mr.P.Patnaik, Advocate (O.P. nos.6 and 7)
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
ORDER
Order No.
19.
25.11.2021
(Arindam Sinha) Judge
RKS
Page 1 of 1
Trishna Agarwal
State of Odisha
Opposite Parties nos. 6 and 7
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
