The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack did not entertain the merits of the writ petition. The respondent was directed to be served an extra copy of the petition as requested by the petitioner's counsel. The matter was listed for future hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.26852 of 2017
Bhupati Behera …. Petitioner
Mr. Rama Chandra Jena, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others …. Opp. Parties
Mr. P. Mohapatra,
Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE BISWAJIT MOHANTY
ORDER
Order No. 22.07.2021
03. Heard Mr. Jena, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.
Mohapatra, learned Additional Standing Counsel through video
conferencing mode.
As requested by Mr. Jena, list this matter next week. In the
meantime, he is directed to serve an extra copy of the writ petition
on learned counsel for the State.
( Biswajit Mohanty)
Judge
Jagabandhu
Bhupati Behera
State of Odisha
BISWAJIT MOHANTY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
