The High Court directed the Collector, Jharsuguda, to dispose of the petitioner's representation via a reasoned order within two months and disposed of the present writ application.
Directed Collector, Jharsuguda to dispose representation via reasoned order in two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) NO.9564 OF 2020
Smt. Geetanjali Sai ……. Petitioner Mr. S.N. Satpathy, Adv.
-Versus-
State of Odisha & others
……. Opposite Parties
Mr. P.P. Mohanty, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE C.R. DASH
JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
15.07.2021
Order No.
02.
1. This matter is taken up by virtual mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned
Addl. Government Advocate for the State.
3. The petitioner has filed a representation vide
Annexure- 9 before the Collector, Jharsuguda- Opposite
Party No.2 for redressal of her grievance.
4. Regard being had to the facts and submissions and
the nature of relief sought for, this writ application is
disposed of directing the Collector, Jharsuguda- Opposite
Party No.2 to dispose of the representation of the
petitioner vide Annexure- 9, by passing a reasoned order, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order or true soft copy available in the Orissa High Court website.
…………………………. (C.R. Dash) JUDGE
………………………….
(Savitri Ratho) JUDGE
Subha
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ application merits a direction to the authoritative officer to dispose of the petitioner's representation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Geetanjali Sai
State of Odisha
Collector, Jharsuguda
C.R. DASH
SAVITRI RATHO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
