The High Court of Orissa disposed of a writ petition challenging demands under the SARFAESI Act. The Petitioner was advised to seek redressal from the competent authority.
Petitioner advised to move competent authority for redressal of grievance arising out of SARFAESI Act demand.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.7894 of 2021
Sankarsan Behera …… Petitioner Mr. D. Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
Authorized Officer, Assets Reconstruction
Company (India) Ltd. & Anr. …… Opposite Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE C.R. DASH
JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
15.07.2021
Order No.
02. 1. This matter is taken up by virtual mode.
2. Heard.
3. As the matter arises out of demand in the SARFAESI
Act, 2002, the petitioner, if so advised, may move the
competent authority for redressal of his grievance.
2
utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No.4798 dated 15th April, 2021.
(C.R. Dash)
Judge
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Murmu
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sankarsan Behera
Authorized Officer, Assets Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. & Anr.
C.R. DASH
SAVITRI RATHO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
