Kulamani Mishra v. Hdfc Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition disposed shortly. Court directed petitioner to move competent court for rem, just because matter arose out of SARFAESI Act.
What did the court decide?
Order directed petitioner, to move competent court, for redressal of his grievance, since matter arose out of SARFAESI Act.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.4208 of 2020
Kulamani Mishra …… Petitioner
Mr. Krushna Ch.Dash,
Advocate
-versus-
HDFC Limited. ....... Opposite Party
CORAM:
JUSTICE C.R. DASH
JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
15.07.2021
Order No.
04. 1. This matter is taken up by virtual mode.
2. Heard.
3. As the matter arises out of demand under the
Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and
Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act, the
petitioner, if so advised, may move the competent court for
redressal of his grievance.
- With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. 5. As the restrictions due to COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout
2
of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No. 4587 dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No.4798 dated 15th April, 2021.
(C.R. Dash) Judge
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Dhal
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kulamani Mishra
- respondent
HDFC Limited
Coram
C.R. Dash
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court