Disposed
Arabinda Dhal v. O.U.A.T.
Orissa HCWP(C)/6448/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
The matter is taken up through video…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 6448 of 2005
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that since the case is of the year 2005, he has no instruction in the matter. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum, if any cause of action still survives.
In such view of the matter, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
…………….…………… (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Alok
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court