Saroja Kumar Choudhury Vs State of Odisha

W.P.(C) No. 534 of 2021

03.02.2021 The matter is taken up through video conferencing. Heard Mr. A.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to approve the appointment of the petitioner as a Junior Clerk, Ostia G.P. High School, Bishnupur, Banki in the district of Cuttack.

¶4

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievance, the petitioner has made representation vide Annexure-11 and direction be given to the opposite party no.1 to consider and dispose of the same.

¶5

In view of the aforesaid limited grievance of the petitioner, this Court disposes of the writ petition directing the opposite party no.1 to take a decision on the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-11 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified/ authenticated copy of this order by the petitioner.

¶6

As COVID-19 pandemic situation is continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s official website or print out thereof at par with certified copies in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25.03.2020.

¶7

…………….……………

¶8

(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE

¶9

GDS

Saroja Kumar Choudhury v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saroja Kumar Choudhury v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baburam Naik Vs State of Odisha

Manjulata Khuntia Vs State of Odisha

Radhei Rout @ Budhei Rout Vs State of Odisha

Dr.Rabindra N.Hota Vs Ravenshaw University

Damodar Nayak Vs State of Odisha

Nirmal Kumar Prusty Vs State of Odisha