Disposal of a writ petition challenging tax and penalties on a vehicle. The court decided the matter by referring to an existing judgment rather than making new findings or arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 5728 of 2021
(virtual/physical mode).
Heard Mr. B.M. Sarangi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.K. Behera, learned Standing Counsel for Transport Department.
The petitioner has filed this application challenging the tax and penalty imposed on his vehicle by the authority.
Considering the contentions raised in the writ petition and after hearing learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of in the light of the judgment passed by this Court in Sujit Kumar Dhir v. R.T.O., Keonjhar, 2014 (II) OLR 1070 .
…………….……………….. (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J)
Ajaya
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sujit Kumar Dhir v. R.T.O., KeonjharReferred¶6
Sujit Kumar Dhir v. R.T.O., Keonjhar, 2014 (II) OLR 1070
Petitioner
Transport Department
DR. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
