The High Court of Orissa allowed an interlocutory application to amend the prayer portion of a writ petition and disposed of another application to correct dates in a previous order via hybrid hearing mode.
Amendment of prayer portion allowed; dates in a previous order corrected; applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.3792 OF 2021
Pradyumna Mohanty & Ors.
Petitioners
Mr. K.K. Swain, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha & Ors. ….. Opposite party
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER 21.12.2021
I.A. No.18103 of 2021
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 03
Alok
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Cont…..
I.A. No.18102 of 2021
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether leave is granted for amendment of the prayer in the writ petition.
Whether an interlocutory application to correct dates in an earlier order is allowed.
Pradyumna Mohanty & Ors.
State of Odisha & Ors.
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
