Dismissed
Ashok Kumar Kandi v. the State of Odisha
Orissa HCCRLMP/145/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
The matter is taken up through hybrid…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRLMP No. 145 of 2021
The matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement (virtual/physical mode).
Heard Mr. S. Satpathy, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing for the opposite parties, and perused the record.
The petitioner has filed this application against non-registration of F.I.R. pursuant to complaint lodged in Annexure-1.
Considering the submissions made, the petitioner is permitted to pursue his remedy before the appropriate forum in view of the law laid down by the apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari V. State of U.P ., AIR 2014 SC 187.
With the above direction, the CRLMP stands disposed of.
As COVID-19 pandemic situation is continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s official website or print out thereof at par with certified copies in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25.03.2020.
…………….…………… (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Ajaya
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lalita Kumari V. State of U.P.Referred¶6
Lalita Kumari V. State of U.P., AIR 2014 SC 187 · Who else cites this
Petitioner
State
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court