The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition nil ordering no further proceedings in view of a common judgment passed in a batch of connected petitions regarding the O.A.T. Bar Association case.
Writ petition disposed of with no further order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.37352 of 2020
Namita Pradhan
…. Petitioner
Mr. P.K. Deo, Advocate -Versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. A. Pr. Das, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
Order No.
ORDER 11.12.2021
2.Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge
T.TUDU
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
O.A.T. Bar Association, Cuttack v. Union of India and othersReferred¶14
W.P.(C) No.13789 of 2019 (O.A.T. Bar Association, Cuttack v. Union of India and others)
Namita Pradhan
State of Odisha
Dr. S. Muralidhar
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
