The petitioner challenged an order not passed. The High Court of Orissa observed that a common judgment in a related writ petition rendered the present petition redundant, and disposed of the petition accordingly.
The writ petition is disposed of as no further order is required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.35793 of 2020
Manoranjan Pattanaik
…. Petitioner
Mr. S,B. Jena, Advocate -Versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. A. Pr. Das, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
Order No.
ORDER 11.12.2021 1. In view of the common judgment dated 7th June 2021, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.13789 of 2019 (O.A.T. Bar Association, Cuttack v. Union of India and others) and batch, no further order is required to be passed in the present petition.
2.Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge
T.TUDU
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
O.A.T. Bar Association, Cuttack v. Union of India and othersReferred¶1
W.P.(C) No.13789 of 2019 (O.A.T. Bar Association, Cuttack v. Union of India and others)
Manoranjan Pattanaik
State of Odisha
Chief Justice Dr. S. Muralidhar
Justice R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
