The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by referring to a common judgment in a batch case, noting that no further order was required in view of the earlier decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.35743 of 2020
Nabaghana Prusty
…. Petitioner
Mr. S,B. Jena, Advocate -Versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. A. Pr. Das, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
Order No.
ORDER 11.12.2021 1. In view of the common judgment dated 7th June 2021, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.13789 of 2019 (O.A.T. Bar Association, Cuttack v. Union of India and others) and batch, no further order is required to be passed in the present petition.
2.Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge
T.TUDU
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
O.A.T. Bar Association, Cuttack v. Union of IndiaReferred¶14
W.P.(C) No.13789 of 2019 (O.A.T. Bar Association, Cuttack v. Union of India and others)
Nabaghana Prusty
State of Odisha
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
R.K. PATTANAIAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
