Disposed
Santosh Kumar Jena v. State of Odisha
Orissa HCWP(C)/356/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.356 of 2020
Santosh Kumar Jena
…. Petitioner
Mr. G.P. Pattnaik, Advocate -Versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. A. Pr. Das, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
Order No.
ORDER 11.12.2021
2.Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge
T.TUDU
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
O.A.T. Bar Association, Cuttack v. Union of India and othersRelied on¶1
W.P.(C) No.13789 of 2019 (O.A.T. Bar Association, Cuttack v. Union of India and others)
Santosh Kumar Jena
State of Odisha
Justice R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court