Petitioner sought CDA allotment of a plot but was disqualified due to prior sale of an allotted plot to a third party. The Court directed the authority to consider the fresh application and communicate the decision with reasons within three weeks as a interlocutory direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.33826 of 2021 (Through hybrid mode)
Mr.Subash Chandra Puspalaka, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and another
…. Opposite Parties
Mr.A.K.Sharma, Addl. Govt. Advocate (O.P. no.1) Mr.D.Mohapattra, Advocate (O.P.no.2)
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
ORDER 22.11.2021
Order No.
02.
Page 1 of 1
// 2 //
(Arindam Sinha)
Judge
RKS
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to seek allotment of a plot under the Cuttack Development Authority (CDA).
How the CDA must communicate the result of the petitioner's allotment application to him.
Subash Chandra Puspalaka
State of Odisha
Cuttack Development Authority
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
