The writ petition filed by Prasanta Kumar Behera was dismissed not merits but as not pressed by the petitioner, necessitating no legal proposition or principles.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.21107 of 2016
(Through hybrid mode)
Prasanta Kumar Behera …. Petitioner
Mr. K.C.Tripathy, Advocate
-versus-
…. RTO, Keonjhar & another Opposite Parties Mr.P.K.Ray, Advocate (O.P.No.2)
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
Order No.
ORDER
17.11.2021
5. 1. Mr. Tripathy, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, he has instruction to not press the writ petition. Mr. Ray, learned advocate appears on behalf of opposite party no. 2.
RKS
Page 1 of 1
Prasanta Kumar Behera
RTO, Keonjhar
another Opposite Party
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
