The High Court of Orissa dismissed the second writ petition challenging the cancellation of a tender. The Court held that the cancellation order issued by the Head Office was correct and devoid of merit, given the Ministry's involvement and the non-profit nature of the institute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 28634 of 2021
M/s. Bhabani @ Bhavani Security Agency
…. Petitioner
Mr. Soumya Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
The Central Council for Research in …. Opposite Parties Unani Medicine & Another
Mr. P.K. Parhi, A.S.G.I.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER 24.09.2021
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
finalize the tender process in accordance with law. No reasons for cancelling the tender have been communicated to the petitioner as yet .
application.
(S.K. Mishra)
Judge
( Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Sukanta
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court was right in dismissing the writ petition challenging the cancellation of a tender by a central research institute.
Whether the lack of specific reasons for cancellation warrants judicial intervention in the context of the central government's directive.
M/s. Bhabani @ Bhavani Security Agency
The Central Council for Research in Unani Medicine
S.K. Mishra
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
