Disposed

Taradevi Charitable Trust v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC23 Sept 2021WP(C)/11945/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petitioner sought direction to Director of Medical Education to dispose of pending representation for grant of NOC. Court disposed of petition without opining on merits, directing representation be treated within 45 days with hearing.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Director of Medical Education to consider representation and dispose by reasoned order within 45 days alleging hearing.

Taradevi Charitable Trust Vs State of Odisha — Service and Employment | Orissa HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P. (C) No.11945 of 2021

¶3

Taradevi Charitable Trust

¶4

Mr. P.K. Mohanty, Advocate

¶5

State of Odisha and Others.

¶6

…. Opposite Parties

¶7

Mr. Rajani Chandra Mohanty, for the DMET

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

ORDER

Order No.

23.09.2021

This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties.

¶16

In this writ petition, the Petitioner has prayed for issuance of a direction to the Opposite Party No.2-Director of Medical Education and Training Department, Govt. of Odisha, Bhubaneswar to dispose of the representation of the Petitioner with regard to grant of NOC for establishment of New B. Pharma Training Course, as at Annexure-2 within a stipulated period.

¶17

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that in order to ventilate the aforesaid grievance, the Petitioner has made a representation before the Opposite Party No.2-Director of Medical Education and Training Department, Govt. of Odisha,

¶18

Page 1 of 2

¶19

// 2 //

¶20

Bhubaneswar, under Annexure-2, but the same is still pending. He therefore, submits that a direction may be given to the Opposite Party No.2 to dispose of the representation of the Petitioner at an early date.

¶21

In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the claim of the Petitioner, giving liberty to the Petitioner to file a representation before the Opposite Party No.2 within fifteen days hence along with a certified copy of the order and a copy of the brief. On such event, the opposite party no.2 shall consider the representation and after affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner dispose of the same, within a period of forty-five days from the date of production of a certified copy of this order along with copy of the brief, by a reasoned and speaking order.

¶22

With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶23

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.

¶24

(S.K. Mishra) Judge

¶25

(Savitri Ratho)

Judge

T.TUDU

Page 2 of 2

// 3 //

Page 3 of 2

Taradevi Charitable Trust v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Taradevi Charitable Trust v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Maa Santoshi Ind Vs State and Ors.

M/S.Sidhant Mines and Vs State and Ors.

Gobinda Ch.Nayak Vs Bharata Mallik and or

Surya Bharati Charitable Trust Vs State of Odisha

Taradevi Charitable Trust Vs State of Odisha

Sumanta Kumar Mohapatra Vs Odisha State Civil Supplies Corp. Ltd.