The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking a fresh auction for a non-operational sand sailat due to changed circumstances and passage of time.
No fresh auction was ordered; the court merely accepted the submission that a fresh auction is required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C ) No.25969 of 2020
Shree Equipments and Engineers …. Petitioner Mr. Niranjan Lenka, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. M.S. Sahoo, AGA
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
ORDER
Order No.
23.06.2021
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(S.K. Panigrahi)
Judge
Sangita Patra/ Lingaraj Behera
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the State is required to hold a fresh auction for a sand sailat that could not proceed due to passage of time and changed circumstances.
Shree Equipments and Engineers
State of Odisha
Justice S.K. Panigrahi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
