The High Court dismissed the writ appeal as withdrawn by the appellant on the ground that the dispute between the parties had been settled. No substantive legal principles or precedents were discussed.
The Writ Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.A No. 492 of 2020
M/s.Kalinga Commercial Corporation Limited
Appellants
Mr.Amita Panda, Advocate
-versus-
Order No.
The Telengana Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, Hyderabad and another
…. Hyderabad and another Respondents Mr. Sidhartha Mohanty, Advocate (For Respondent No.2)
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI ORDER 23.06.2021
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No.4798, dated 15th April, 2021.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
(S.K. Panigrahi) Judge
Sangita Patra/ Lingaraj Behera
Page 2 of 2
M/s. Kalinga Commercial Corporation Limited
The Telengana Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, Hyderabad and another
S.K. Panigrahi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
