This single-paragraph order dismisses the petitioner's writ petition challenging tax and penalty on the vehicle by directing the opposite party to consider the case based on a specific judgment and issues an urgent certified copy.
Order to consider the case in light of Sujit Kumar Dhir v. R.T.O., Keonjhar; Issue urgent certified copy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.24716 OF 2021
M/s. Virat Constructions ….. Petitioner Mr. S.M. Singh, Advocate Vs. RTO, Jharsuguda ….. Opposite parties
Mr. Pravakar Behera, S.C. Transport Deptt.
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER 24.08.2021
Order No. This matter is taken up by video conferencing 1 mode. Heard Mr. S.M. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P. Behera, learned Standing Counsel for Transport Department.
Perused the record. The petitioner has filed this application challenging the tax and penalty imposing on his vehicle by the authority.
Considering the contention raised in the writ petition and after hearing learned counsel for the opposite party, this writ petition is disposed of directing the opposite party to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by this Court in Sujit Kumar Dhir v. R.T.O., Keonjhar, 2014 (II) OLR 1070.
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
Alok
(DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's case should be considered in light of the judgment passed by this Court in Sujit Kumar Dhir v. R.T.O., Keonjhar.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sujit Kumar Dhir v. R.T.O., KeonjharReferred¶10
Sujit Kumar Dhir v. R.T.O., Keonjhar, 2014 (II) OLR 1070
M/s. Virat Constructions
RTO, Jharsuguda
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
