The High Court of Orissa dismissed the Writ Petition because the petitioner's counsel submitted that he had no instruction in the matter at the time of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.22537 of 2017
Kailash Ch. Jena …. Petitioner Mr. P.K. Rath, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Odisha & Ors. Opposite Parties Mr. R.N. Mishra, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH ORDER 02.09.2021
Order No. 11. 1. It is submitted by the learned counsel for Petitioner that he has no instruction in the matter. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed for having no instruction at present. (Biswanath Rath) Judge
A.K. Jena
Page 1 of 1
Kailash Ch. Jena
State of Odisha
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
