Baruna Gauda v. State and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed for lack of prosecution as the petitioner's counsel had no instructions on the date of hearing.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C) No.2223 of 2012
Baruna Gauda and another
…. Petitioners Mr. A. K. Patra, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Odisha and others Opposite Parties Mr. Debakanta Mohanty, AGA and Mr. R. P. Kar, Advocate for Opp. Party 4
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE A. K. MOHAPATRA
ORDER 16.11.2021 Order No. 04. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioners states that he has no instructions. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (A. K. Mohapatra ) Judge
M. Panda
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Baruna Gauda and another
- respondent
State of Odisha and others
Coram
A. K. Mohapatra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court