The Court dismissed a writ petition challenging compensation entitlement. It held that since the land acquisition award was passed under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the petitioner is not eligible for compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 2013.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.14420 of 2015
Sri JagatramRohi Das …. Petitioner Mr. D.R. Mohapatra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & others
…. Opposite Parties Mrs.SumanPattnaik, A.G.A.
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE A.K.MOHAPATRA
ORDER
15.11.2021
Order No.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
(A.K. Mohapatra) Judge
U.K.Sahoo/J.Behera
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a petitioner is entitled to compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 when the award was passed in 2013 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
Whether the date of the award, bearing in mind the date of receipt of compensation, determines the applicable statutory regime for compensation.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri Jagatram Rohi Das
State of Odisha & others
A.K. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
