Subash Chandra Mohanty v. Tahasildar, Chandabali
Case brief
What is this about?
This matter is taken up by virtual mode.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) NO.12747 OF 2021
This matter is taken up by virtual mode. Heard.
The order has already been passed in Mutation Case No.2173 of 2017 by the Tahasildar, Chandbali for issuance of Mutation ROR in favour of the petitioner. In spite of such order, no mutation ROR is being issued since 2017.
Regard being had to the facts and submissions, the writ application is disposed of, directing the petitioner to file a representation before the Tahasildar, Chandabali within two weeks from today. If such a representation is filed, the same shall be disposed of within four weeks from the date of its filing and necessary ROR be issued in favour of the petitioner in Mutation Case No.2173 of 2017, if there is no other legal impediment.
The writ application is accordingly disposed
of.
As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No.4798 dated 15th April, 2021.
………………………….
Subha
Subha
Petitioner
Tahasildar, Chandbali
Subha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court