Petitioner sought writ jurisdiction for easementary right denied by revenue authorities. Bench directed petitioner to approach civil court with jurisdiction and disposed of the writ petition.
Petitioner directed to approach civil court having jurisdiction over the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.2746 of 2014
Gobinda Chandra Nayak
Petitioner
Mr. L. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
….
State of Orissa & others Opposite Parties
Mr. P.P. Mohanty, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA
JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
22.09.2021
Order No.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
(S.K. Mishra )
Judge
(Savitri Ratho )
Judge
pcd
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise writ jurisdiction to grant easementary right instead of directing approach to civil court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gobinda Chandra Nayak
State of Orissa & others
S.K. MISHRA
SAVITRI RATHO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
