The High Court dismissed the writ petition against a disciplinary order imposing a fine. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal and extended an existing interim order. No substantive legal principle was articulated.
Liberty to prefer an appeal within 15 days; interim stay on salary recovery extended till 31 December 2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 11273 OF 2012
Bimbadhar Biswal …. Petitioner
Mr. V. Mohapatra, Advocate on behalf of Mr. A.K. Mohapatra, Adv. -Versus -
Odisha Tourism …. Opposite Parties Development Corporation Ltd. and another
CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
19.08.2021
Order No. 06
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
Page 1 of 2
Ashok
may continue with regard to recovery of the amount from the salary of the petitioner.
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a brief order disposing of a writ petition while granting liberty to prefer an appeal requires a substantive headnote.
Bimbadhar Biswal
Odisha Tourism
Development Corporation Ltd
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
