Dismissed
Utkal Manufacturing v. State
Orissa HCWP(C)/10139/2010
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Single judge disposed of the writ petition by leaving open the petitioner's right to appeal and permitted the use of printouts due to COVID-19 restrictions.
What did the court decide?
Leave to use printed copies of the judgment attested by counsel in lieu of attested photocopies.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
¶2
W.P.(C) No.10139 of 2010
¶3
M.s.Utkal Manufacturing & Services …. Petitioner Ltd.
¶4
Mr.P.K.Jena, Advocate
¶5
-versus-
¶6
State of Odisha and Others
¶7
…. Opposite Parties Mr.S.Mishra, ASC for Sales Tax
¶8
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
¶9
JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
¶10
ORDER
¶11
22.04.2021
¶12
Order No.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
M.s.Utkal Manufacturing & Services Ltd.
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
AI extract
B. P. ROUTRAY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court