M/S Bbta Rpcl (Jv) v. Narayan Prasad Patra
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition is closed as infructuous because the underlying matter is no longer subsisting. No substantive legal principle is established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.1461 of 2021
M/s. BBTA RPCL (JV) through its Director Gourav Kumar Singh
…. Petitioner
Mr. Milan Kanungo, Sr. Advocate -versus-
Narayan Prasad Patra
…. Opp. Party
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
Order No.
22.04.2021
The matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.
The contempt petition is closed having become infructuous.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
( B.P. Routray)
Judge
M.K. Panda/K. Majhi
M/s. BBTA RPCL (JV) through its Director Gourav Kumar Singh
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court