This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.10068 of 2018
Santosh Kumar Debnath and …. others Mr. Kabir Kumar Jena, Advocate,
…. Petitioners
-versus-
…. State of Odisha and others Opp. Parties Mr. S.K. Samal, Additional Government Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWAJIT MOHANTY ORDER Order No. 27.07.2021 02. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Samal, learned Additional Government Advocate through video conferencing mode.
Order No.
During course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw this application with liberty to file appropriate petition.
Considering the submissions made, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the above liberty.
Parties may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s Website or print out thereof at par with certified copy in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25.03.2020 read with Notice No.4798 dated 15.04.2021.
( Biswajit Mohanty) Judge
Jagabandhu
Santosh Kumar Debnath
State of Odisha
BISWAJIT MOHANTY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
