Surjendu Mohapatra v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners did not press the writ application; it was dismissed accordingly and the interim order was vacated.
What did the court decide?
Dismissal of writ application as not pressed; vacating of interim order dated 04.08.1999.
What the court decided
OJC No. 8328 of 1999
- 20.01.2021 The matter is taken up through video
conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners do not want to press this writ application.
In view of the above submission, the writ application stands dismissed as not pressed.
The interim order dated 04.08.1999 passed in Misc. Case No.7649 of 1999 stands vacated.
…………….……………
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Ashok
Coram
B.R. Sarangi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court