Shyam Sundar Swain v. Chairman,C.D.a.
Case brief
What is this about?
The matter is taken up through video…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OJC No. 6510 of 2002
conferencing.
None appears for the petitioner at the time of call.
Mr. Dayananda Mohapatra, learned counsel for opposite party-CDA is present.
Perused the record. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite parties no.1 and 2 to allot a piece of land in CDA, Cuttack.
On perusal of records, it is found that Cuttack Development Authority had issued a notice on 25.04.2002 under Annexure-1 with regard to cancellation of plots in favour of the allottees. As such, the petitioner has submitted an application under Annexure-2 with an endorsement of Minister, Urban Development, P.G. & P.A., Orissa for allotment of a plot in discretionary quota.
Mr. Dayananda Mohapatra, learned counsel for opposite party-CDA contended that in the meantime the scheme of discretionary quota has been stopped.
In such view of the matter, the writ petition merits no consideration and accordingly the same is hereby dismissed.
Ashok
…………….……………
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Ashok
Petitioner
CDA (Cuttack Development Authority)
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court