Disposed
G. Debendra Rao v. G. Puspa Prabha Rao
Orissa HCMATA/37/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2021 02. 09.03.2021 The case is taken up…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MATA No.37 of 2020
I.A. No.27 of 2021
Heard Mr. Biren Sankar Tripathy, learned counsel for the appellant-petitioner and Mr. Bikash Karna, learned counsel for the respondent-opposite parties. This is an application for change of nomenclature. It is apparent from the record that order impugned has been passed in a criminal proceeding under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. So, the proper nomenclature is RPFAM. Hence, the MATA be converted into RPFAM. The I.A. is disposed of. ……………………. S.K. Mishra, J. ……………………. Savitri Ratho,J. RPFAM No. 03. 09.03.2021 Register. List this matter before the assigned Bench. ……………………. S.K. Mishra, J. ……………………. Savitri Ratho,J.
pcd
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Appellant-petitioner
Respondent-opposite parties
S.K. Mishra
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court