Disposed
Pavada Komali v. State and Ors.
Orissa HCWPCRL/1092/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
None appears for the petitioner and opposite…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCRL No.1092 of 2013
3 08.3.2021. None appears for the petitioner and opposite party no.4. Mr. Deepak Kumar Parida, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State is present.
Perused the documents. It is submitted before this Court that the accused persons have already been arrested and released on bail. We do not find any reason to change the Investigating Officer and keep the matter pending.
Accordingly, the WPCRL is disposed of.
………..………….. S.K.Mishra, J
…………………….. Savitri Ratho, J
AKB
Petitioner
Opposite party no.4
State
S.K.Mishra
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court