In two separate appeals filed by the husband and wife, the High Court disposed of the matters in a National Lok Adalat. The Court confirmed the earlier Family Court decree of divorce and settled the permanent alimony based on a compromise agreement filed by the parties via affidavits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MATA Nos.121 and 124 of 2014
In MATA No.121 of 2014
Rakesh Kumar Sahoo …. Appellant
M/s. Suvashis Pattanaik, Adv.
-versus-
….
Dipalisa Sahu Respondent
Mr. Balaram Nayak, Adv.
In MATA No.124 of 2014
….
Dipalisa Sahu Appellant
Mr. Balaram Nayak, Adv.
-versus-
Rakesh Kumar Sahoo …. Respondent
M/s. Suvashis Pattanaik, Adv.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA
JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
19.09.2021
Order No.
Page 1 of 3
// 2 //
Page 2 of 3
// 3 //
application.
……………………. S. K.Mishra, J.
(3rd National Lok Adalat)
..………………..… Savitri Ratho, J. (3rd National Lok Adalat)
BJ
Page 3 of 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to set aside the divorce decree and order of the Family Court or enhance the permanent alimony?
Whether to dispose of the appeals based on the compromise between the parties?
Rakesh Kumar Sahoo
Dipalisa Sahu
S.K. Mishra
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
