The High Court of Orissa allowed an appeal filed by two appellants rejecting bail prayer. The court disposed the matter and released appellants on bail with conditions considering investigation completed and no further material against them.
The appellants were released on bail with fixed conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLA No. 51 of 2021
1. Kabiraj Kharsel
2. Tofan Suna @ Satrughana …. Appellants Sunani
Mr. A.K. Sahoo, Advocate
Versus
1. State of Orissa
…. Respondents
Mr. Sibani Shankar Pradhan, A.G.A. None (for Respondent No.2)
CORAM:
JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER 08.12.2021
Order No.
Page 1 of 3
// 2 //
Judge, Nuapada for commission of offences punishable under Sections 302/201/34 of I.P.C. read with Sections 3(2)(v) of the SC & ST (POA) Act, praying to release the appellants on bail.
Page 2 of 3
// 3 //
Sukanta
application.
.........................
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Page 3 of 3
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellants should be released on bail
Whether rejection of bail prayer asked from by appellants was proper
Whether investigation was completed and appeal was disposed of
4 provisions across 4 enactments
KABIRAJ KHARSEL
TOFAN SUNA
STATE OF ORISSA
JITU MAHANANDA
SAVITRI RATHO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
