In this matter, the court considered an application for restoration of F.A. No.67 of 1990, originally dismissed for non-prosecution. The court allowed the prayer and restored the appeal to file.
F.A. No.67 of 1990 restored to file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMAPL No.448 of 2015
This is an application for restoration of the Appeal (F.A. No.67 of 1990) which has been dismissed for nonprosecution on 2.7.2015.
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners. None appears for the Opposite Parties despite service of notice.
Considering the submissions made and on going through the averments made in this application, prayer for restoration is allowed and F.A. No.67 of 1990 is restored to file.
The CMAPL is disposed of accordingly.
…………………..
Basu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for restoration of Appeal F.A. No.67 of 1990 dismissed for non-prosecution should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioners
Opposite Parties
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
