Abhaya Kumar Barik v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMAPL No.118…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMAPL No.118 of 2021
Abhaya Kumar Barik
..... Petitioner
Mr.M.S.Sahoo, Advocate
- Versus-
State of Odisha & Others
Opposite party
Mr.S.P.Panda, Addl.Govt.Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
15.07.2021
02
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
3. Considering the dismissal of the writ petition for nonprosecution and difficulties stated in the CMAPL with a ground for failure of link through video conferencing mode, this Court finds the restoration application at this stage is justified. Consequently, the prayer for restoration is allowed and W.P.(C).No.9828 of 2021 is restored to its file with interim order if any.
4. CMAPL stands disposed of.
5. As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021.
(BISWANATH RATH) JUDGE
sks
Abhaya Kumar Barik
State of Odisha
BISWANATH RATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court