In this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. regarding NDPS charges, the High Court declined to reconsider the bail prayer, noting the quantity of contraband and the petitioner's role, while urging the trial court for an early conclusion of proceedings.
Bail application dismissed; no reconsideration of bail prayer granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL NO.3128 OF 2021
Niranjan Parida
…. Petitioner
Mr.Manas Chand, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Mr. Soubhagya Ketan Nayak, AGA
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH
ORDER 03.09.2021
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
seized with other surrounding circumstances, at this stage; this Court is not inclined to reconsider the prayer for grant of bail to the Petitioner. It is however observed that the Trial Court would do well to take all such effective steps as provided in law for early conclusion of the Trial.
Narayan
(D. Dash),
Judge.
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application by the accused in connection with NDPS charges under Section 20(b)(ii)(C)/25/29 of the NDPS Act should be reconsidered.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Niranjan Parida
State of Odisha
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
