The High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a Vigilance case, directing the arresting officer to release him on standard bail conditions while ensuring cooperation with the investigation.
Petitioner directed to be released on bail with conditions to appear for investigation and not tamper with evidence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.13667 of 2019
Bamadev Sankhual
…. Petitioners
Mr.Ramani Kanta Pattanaik, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Odisha (Vigilance) Opposite Party Mr. M.S. Rizvi, ASC (Vig.)
CORAM: MR. JUSTICE D.DASH ORDER 03.09.2021
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
September, 2021 in between 10 am to 2 pm and on such other date/s as asked for in order to cooperate with the investigation; and will not tamper the prosecution evidence in any manner.
Violation of any of the condition/s shall entail cancellation of bail.
H
(D. Dash)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can be granted bail pending investigation by the Vigilance Department.
Bamadev Sankhual
State of Odisha (Vigilance)
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
