This bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was disposed of without granting relief. The bench observed they were not inclined to accept the prayer and directed the trial court to ensure early conclusion of the trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.3655 OF 2021
Bapi @ Samir Kumar Nayak
…. Petitioner Mr.S.C. Das, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Mr.K.K. Das, ASC
CORAM:
Order
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH
ORDER 02.09.2021
No. 04. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode). 2. The Petitioner being in custody in connection with Mahuldiha P.S. Case No.02 of 2019 corresponding to G.R. Case No.21 of 2019 running for commission of offence under sections 302 of the IPC on the file of the learned S.D.J.M., Kendrapara further corresponding to S.T. Case No.42 of 2019 pending on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karanjia, has filed this application under section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for his release on bail.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
accusations as those emanate therefrom and other surrounding circumstances; while being not inclined to accept the prayer for grant of bail to the Petitioner; the application stands disposed of with the observation that the trial court would do well to take all such effective steps as provided in law for early conclusion of the trial in accordance with law.
Basu
(D. Dash),
Judge.
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant bail to a petitioner accused of murder under Section 302 IPC.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Bapi @ Samir Kumar Nayak
State of Odisha
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
