Dismissed
Girish Sendha v. State of Odisha
Orissa HCWPCRL/113/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
This matter is taken up through Video…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCRL No.113 of 2020
Mr. R.N. Behera, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.K. Nanda, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State are present through Video Conferencing.
Mr. A.K. Nanda, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State submits that in the meantime, the victim girl has been rescued and the accused has been arrested. A case under Section 363/ 366/ 376(3)/ 376(2)(n)/ 34 of the I.P.C. read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act has been initiated against the accused. The victim girl has been produced before the jurisdictional magistrate and her statement has been recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. The victim girl has been left in the safe custody of her mother.
In that view of the matter, this WPCRL has become infructuous. Copies of the documents sent by the Additional Government Advocate shall form a part of the record. The WPCRL is disposed of as infructuous.
As restrictions are continuing due to COVID-19 pandemic, learned counsel for the parties may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s official website or print out thereof at par with certified
2
copies in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25.03.2020.
……………………….. S. K. Mishra, J.
….………………………. Savitri Ratho, J.
BJ
S. K. Mishra
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court