Anupama Naik v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
This matter is taken up through Video…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) NO. 29227 OF 2020
- 2 3.11.2020 This matter is taken up through Video
Conferencing.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
It is alleged that the order of the Tribunal at
Annexure-1 has not been complied with.
Considering the limited request involved and as the matter involves working out of Annexure-1, this Court disposes of the writ petition with direction to the O.Ps. to work out the order of the Tribunal at Annexure-1 forthwith provided there is no legal impediment inasmuch as stay of the said order by the higher forum as on date within one month from the date of communication of this order. Failure of compliance of this Court’s order will amount to initiation of suo motu contempt.
The petitioner may utilise the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copy in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notification No.4587 dated 25.3.2020.
…………………………
Biswanath Rath, J.
Coram
Biswanath Rath
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court