Dibakar Rout v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
1494 of 2021 3. 24.03.2021 This is an…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) NO. 29205 OF 2020
I.A. No. 1494 of 2021
Heard.
Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that in 5th line of unnumbered paragraph-4 of the order dated 11.12.2020 instead of mentioning “Plot Nos.219/2/32, 219/2/33, 219/2/35, it has been inadvertently mentioned as “Plot Nos.219/32, 219/33, 219/2” for which the Petitioners could not comply with the said order.
I find the submission of learned counsel for the Petitioners to be correct. The order dated 11.12.2020 be corrected accordingly to the aforesaid extent. Time fixed for the SubCollector, Athagarh-Opposite Party No.2 to take a decision on the applications filed by the Petitioners as at Annexure-5 series is extended for a further period of three months from today.
Rest part of the order dated 11.12.2020 shall remain unaltered.
The I.A. is accordingly disposed of.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
.................................
bks
2
bks
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court