Tapan Kumar Nanda v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of warrant bail writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to approach the appellate authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 26687 of 2020
Mr. Sudhir Kumar Mallik, Advocate : for petitioner Mr. A.R. Dash, AGA : for State-O.Ps.
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the parties by Video Conferencing mode.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter for some time, prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with a liberty to approach the appellate authority.
In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the appellate authority in accordance with law.
(C.R. Dash) (Mohammad Rafiq) Judge Chief Justice
AD
A.R. Dash
State
Mohammad Rafiq
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court