10.06.2020 I.A. No.98 of 2020 This matter is…
Corrections to dates and FAO numbers in the earlier order; extension of time stipulations by another fifteen days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTC No.685 of 2020
3. 10.06.2020
I.A. No.98 of 2020
This matter is taken up through Video Conferencing.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
The expressions “dated 19.11. 2019” and “FAO No.21625/2019” inadvertently typed in the 2nd & 3rd line of the 2nd paragraph and 5th line of the 3rd paragraph of the order dated 3.06.2020 stands corrected and be read as “dated 29.11.2019” and “FAO No.27 of 2012” and consequently the time stipulation made by the order dated 3.06.2020 is also extended by another fifteen days.
accordingly.
Ayas
Petitioner
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
