Disposed of Contempt Petition No.1360 of 2015 alleging violation of an order dated 09.08.2019. Directed respondents to comply with the impugned order within one month of service. Failure to do so would be treated as deliberate violation.
Contempt petition disposed of; direction to respondents to comply with the order dated 09.08.2019 within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P. No.1360 of 2015 CONTC No.4285 of 2020
This matter is taken up through Video Conferencing. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
This Contempt Petition is filed alleging violation of this Court’s order dated 09.08.2019 passed in W.P.(C).No.13128 of 2019.
Considering the submissions made and as this Court finds, no purpose will be served in issuing notice in such matter, the Contempt Petition stands disposed of with a direction to the O.P.(s) to work out the direction of this Court dated 09.08.2019 issued in W.P.(C).No.13128 of 2019, if not worked out in the meantime, within a period of one month from the date of service of a copy of this order by the petitioners further provided there is no legal impediment otherwise. It is made clear that in the event the order of this Court is not worked out within the time stipulated hereinabove, it will be construed to be deliberate violation of this Court’s order.
Petitioners may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copies in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25.03.2020.
BISWANATH RATH,J
sks
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Contempt Petition alleging violation of an order dated 09.08.2019 should be disposed of without notice.
Petitioner(s)
O.P.(s)
BISWANATH RATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
