Priyasi Nayak v. Subasini Sahu
Case brief
What is this about?
15.12.2020 This matter is taken up through…
What did the court decide?
草丛 No.70 of 2016 restored to file and listed before the appropriate Bench for admission.
15.12.2020 This matter is taken up through…
草丛 No.70 of 2016 restored to file and listed before the appropriate Bench for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMAPL No.807 of 2019
This matter is taken up through Video Conferencing.
Heard Mr. B.P. Tripathy, learned counsel for petitioner.
Considering the submission made by Mr. B.P. Tripathy, learned counsel for petitioner and finding that the RSA No.70 of 2016 is dismissed on technical ground, this Court allows this CMAPL.
RSA No.70 of 2016 be restored to its file and the same be also listed before the appropriate Bench for admission.
CMAPL is disposed of with above direction.
As restrictions are continuing due to COVID-19, petitioner(s) may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copies in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25.03.2020.
…….………………..…
(Biswanath Rath, J.)
Ayas
2
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court